Talk:Political parties in Ukraine
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editThe structure of the article is doubtful for me. What are present parties, and why some minor but parliamentary-presented parties belong to other? Internal link to parties by ideology seems very speculative (moreover, promotional) regarding UA politics. We already had a liberal cat. for Tymoshenko Bloc: western businessmen in Ukraine would die of laughing having heard that :). Needs major work. Ukrained 09:54, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
Now there not part of Lytvyn Bloc
editWhat happend to:
- Party of All-Ukrainian Union of the Left "Justice" (Партія Всеукраїнського Об'єднання Лівих "Справедливість")
- Ukrainian Peasant Democratic Party (Українська Селянська Демократична Партія)
now there not part of Lytvyn Bloc anymore? Mariah-Yulia (talk) 22:17, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
What is with the list?
editUnder the section defunct parties there are listed a number of parties that in truth are not defunct although their union or bloc is. The question is: why to list those parties? Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 00:39, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
Just Ukraine Party
editThis party also exists. But does not seem to run for any elections... — Mariah-Yulia • Talk to me! 01:12, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:08, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
List of political parties in Ukraine → Political parties in Ukraine — The last days I expanded this article with some historic background and information about party differentiation. It may not be perfect but is now much more then a List of political parties in Ukraine. Unfortunatly I could not move the page as the "new title" was already occupied. — Mariah-Yulia • Talk to me! 01:04, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
- Support I think an admin could just move this upon request, since it is uncontroversial and obvious. First Light (talk) 23:35, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
New party "People's Front" in section "Current parliamentary factions"
editPlease incorporate the party People's Front in the section Current parliamentary factions. Icarus4 (talk) 19:37, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
New party created today that is predicted to have a big future....
edit.... because it is believed it is financed by oligarch Ihor Kolomoyskyi information can be found here. — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 18:40, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
Reference on (possibly new part in this article) party financing
editcan be found here (in Ukrainian). — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 21:26, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned references in Political parties in Ukraine
editI check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Political parties in Ukraine's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "UDARisPPB":
- From Ukrainian Democratic Alliance for Reform: (in Russian) Pilots, combat, and journalists. Who goes to the new Verkhovna Rada , Korrespondent.net (September 15, 2014)
Klitschko: I lead my team to Parliament, UDAR official website (14.09.2014)
Deadline for nomination of candidates running in early election to Rada expires, ITAR-TASS (September 15, 2014) - From Ukrainian parliamentary election, 2014: (in Russian) Pilots, combatants, and journalists. Who goes to the new Verkhovna Rada , Korrespondent.net (15 September 2014)
Klitschko: I lead my team to Parliament, UDAR official website (14 September 2014)
Deadline for nomination of candidates running in early election to Rada expires, ITAR-TASS (15 September 2014)
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 20:30, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
- Fixed about 1 minute ago by me, — Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 17:34, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Political parties in Ukraine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130317180048/http://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/eastweek/2012-11-07/after-parliamentary-elections-ukraine-a-tough-victory-party-regions to http://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/eastweek/2012-11-07/after-parliamentary-elections-ukraine-a-tough-victory-party-regions
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131203020408/http://www.ucipr.kiev.ua/publications/electronic-bulletin-your-choice-2012-issue-4-batkivshchyna/lang/en to http://www.ucipr.kiev.ua/publications/electronic-bulletin-your-choice-2012-issue-4-batkivshchyna/lang/en
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141110000000/http://utr.tv/eng/news-from-www-ukrinform-ua/327072-poroshenko_bloc_to_have_greatest_number_of_seats_in_parliament_327072.html to http://utr.tv/eng/news-from-www-ukrinform-ua/327072-poroshenko_bloc_to_have_greatest_number_of_seats_in_parliament_327072.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141112000000/http://en.interfax.com.ua/news/general/233404.html to http://en.interfax.com.ua/news/general/233404.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:26, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
There is more than one axis
editFor instance, "fatherland" is pro EU but conservative and partly right-wing/nationalist. Putting them into "mostly liberal" simply because they are pro EU is really dumb. I suggest to make a table that represents different opinions on different matters (pro/neutral/against). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.219.143.163 (talk) 18:07, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 9 external links on Political parties in Ukraine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141029090732/http://www.cvk.gov.ua/pls/vnd2014/wp001e.html to http://www.cvk.gov.ua/pls/vnd2014/wp001e.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721222004/http://www.lvivnews.info/news/10338.html to http://www.lvivnews.info/news/10338.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101110071318/http://news.dt.ua/news/56168 to http://news.dt.ua/news/56168
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110727012130/http://razumkov.org.ua/eng/poll.php?poll_id=82 to http://razumkov.org.ua/eng/poll.php?poll_id=82
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130515074305/http://www.taraskuzio.net/media20_files/8.pdf to http://www.taraskuzio.net/media20_files/8.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141107175152/http://www.analitik.org.ua/analytics/reports/3dd6270a/3dda3fcf/ to http://www.analitik.org.ua/analytics/reports/3dd6270a/3dda3fcf/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120425143200/http://www.minjust.gov.ua/parties to http://www.minjust.gov.ua/parties
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721034823/http://www.dni.gov/nic/confreports_ukrainechlnge.html to http://www.dni.gov/nic/confreports_ukrainechlnge.html
- Added archive https://archive.is/20140928192613/http://www.hromadske.tv/politics/na-z---yizdi----narodnogo-frontu----predstavili-no to http://www.hromadske.tv/politics/na-z---yizdi----narodnogo-frontu----predstavili-no
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:15, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
Political alignment chart
editPolitical camps | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ukrainian nationalist, Eurosceptic, revival of national culture, eradication of Soviet heritage, and generally far-right and anti-liberal | Pro-Western, pro-NATO, pro-European, and anti-Russian nationalist | Domination of Russian culture and preservation of Soviet culture, latently Eurosceptic, often anti-American and partly anti-liberal | ||||||
Svoboda National Corps Right Sector Congress of Ukrainian Nationalists Ukrainian National Union |
European Solidarity Self Reliance Radical Party Fatherland Revival People's Front Our Ukraine UKROP Movement of New Forces |
Opposition Bloc Our Land Strong Ukraine Labour Ukraine For life Communist Party of Ukraine Ukrainian Choice Progressive Socialist Party of Ukraine |
I have a few bones to pick with this chart:
- Why are nationalist Eurosceptic parties dedicated an entire column? Of the five parties list, four aren't even represented at the Oblast Council level, let alone in parliament. And while the fifth, Svoboda, may have been a major player in Ukrainian politics a decade ago, it now holds exactly one seat in the Verkhovna Rada. This depiction presents far-right, ultranationalist organizations as equals to the likes of Servant of the People or European Solidarity, when in reality that is laughably far from the case. In fact, out of hundreds of organizations, the Right Sector is literally the fourth smallest political party in Ukraine. I would assume this was a dating issue, but beyond Svoboda I'm unaware of any electoral success by the other four parties at all.
- This one is definitely more of a dating issue, but major parties are missing - 288 out of 422 occupied seats in parliament are represented by parties not on this list. Moreover, many of the parties on this list are either no longer electorally relevant or no longer exist at all, and yet more, like Movement of New Forces or Ukrainian Choice never were electorally successful at all.
- Some parties just don't fit this system - I have no clue where a phenomenon like For the Future would go, even though it should absolutely be included as the fourth largest party in the most recent elections.
I'm going to rework this section as a whole and this chart specifically to make it more relevant today; because it's pretty integral to the article, I'm going to leave this here if anyone has any objections :). Best, Cran32 (talk | contributions) 19:20, 5 April 2021 (UTC)