Talk:Ponce de Leon Springs (Atlanta)/GA1
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Unexpectedlydian (talk · contribs) 20:26, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
Hello! I'll be reviewing this article using the table below. Comments to follow soon :) Unexpectedlydian♯4talk‽ 20:26, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
- Hi @JJonahJackalope, I have completed a first review. Thank you for your work on this great article - brilliantly researched and an interesting read! Please let me know if you have any questions about what I've written. I'll put the article on hold now. Unexpectedlydian♯4talk‽ 22:40, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
- Hey @Unexpectedlydian, I just wanted to reach out to let you know that I have made some edits to the article to address the points you made in this review. Apologies for the long time it took me to get to this, I'd been busy during the holidays, but thank you for reviewing the article, and if you have any further questions, comments, or concerns, please let me know. -JJonahJackalope (talk) 19:38, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
- @JJonahJackalope Thanks so much for addressing the comments so clearly! Hope you had a nice time on your holidays. Very happy to promote this to GA now :) Unexpectedlydian♯4talk‽ 20:26, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
A few comments below. I will check prose again at the end of the review. Lead
Early history
Popularity as a trolley park
| |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. |
Lead sections
Layout
Words to watch
Fiction
List incorporation
| |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. |
| |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). |
Source check I've checked all the sources I have access to, only a few very minor comments :) Zaring, Russell A. (Fall 1987) McMahon, Doreen (October 1944) Partridge 1951 Clarke 1881 Toton 2008
Harper's New Monthly Magazine 1879 Williamson & Dunham-Jones 2021 King 1939 Irvine 1938 Herrick & LeGrand 1949 Peale 1886 Janes 1876 Wright 1938 Davis 2013
Klima 1982 MacDougald 1940 Garrett 1981 Grant 1993
| |
2c. it contains no original research. |
| |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. |
| |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. |
| |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). |
| |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. |
| |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. |
| |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. |
| |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. |
| |
7. Overall assessment. |