Talk:Poncelet's closure theorem
Latest comment: 12 years ago by 84.229.216.186 in topic Is there any proof without algebraic geometry?
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Some improvements
editThe previous version implied that that the elliptic curve could either be viewed as a branched cover of C or of D, with branching over the intersection points in either case. I corrected this, and also added a useful link at MathWorld. Hopefully, I didn't make the article too wordy.
I have also written a blog post on this subject http://sbseminar.wordpress.com/2007/07/16/poncelets-porism/ which I think could be useful, but I'll leave it to more experienced Wikipedians to decide whether this is worth linking to.
David Speyer (141.211.62.122) 20:39, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Is there any proof without algebraic geometry?
editIs there any proof of Poncelet porism without algebraic geometry? --84.229.216.186 (talk) 20:26, 2 March 2012 (UTC)