Talk:Ponte Pietra (Verona)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Original materials?

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Those sure don't look like stones. Looks like they rebuilt the bridge to the original design using bricks. - Denimadept (talk) 22:47, 17 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Romans used bricks, perhaps in this bridge. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.69.195.40 (talk) 17:36, 4 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The link to Genua should go to Genoa, not some fictional place called "Disc World" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.69.195.40 (talk) 17:32, 4 February 2012 (UTC)Reply