| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Popé article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
i am wondering
editif this article should be titled Po'pay. A look at the photograph at the bottom of this article National Statuary Hall Collection reveals that this is the spelling used on the statue in the US Capitol building. Carptrash 15:03, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- Even if that's not the best spellign, shouldn't it be listed as an alternative? I know spellings vary (e.g., Dinneh vs. Diné) but if it's a common alternative it should be on the page.
- It is listed as an alternative and there is a redirect at Po'pay. Oh and don't forget to sign your posts with 4 of these ~. Carptrash (talk) 23:28, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
What was Popé's verdict and punishment in 1675?
editThis article says:
- Popé is one of the Native Americans who were accused, arrested and tried for practicing "sorcery" in 1675. Three of the men who were found guilty were taken to their respective villages; two were hanged. One hanged himself before the Spanish could. The remaining 44 were publicly whipped and sentenced to prison.
Something is missing here. The article says that Popé was "accused, arrested and tried". But it doesn't say whether he was found guilty. Isn't that the most important fact about any trial? Why isn't it mentioned here? And if he was found guilty, the article should say what his penalty was. We are only told that 2 were hanged, 1 committed suicided, 3 were sent back to their villages, and 44 were whipped. It's interesting to know the penalties that these other men received, but why aren't we told what penalty Popé received?—Lawrence King (talk) 23:22, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
- I think that I wrote that section, so I'll go back to my sources and see if i can't clear up some of the issues that you have raised. Carptrash (talk) 00:36, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Popé. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://www.lourdes.edu/Portals/O/Files/History/Online_Narrative_History/ONH/Pope.PDF - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718221731/http://www.newmexicohistory.org/filedetails.php?fileID=418 to http://www.newmexicohistory.org/filedetails.php?fileID=418
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:02, 31 December 2017 (UTC)