Talk:Poplar Rates Rebellion
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editThis article is takes a wholly favourable view of the dispute, and contains numerous contentious statements.Philip 16:24, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- I've removed the POV tag now following a very slight rewrite in more encyclopedic style, but I don't really see any serious neutrality problems with it anyway. If anyone wants to point out which statements they believe are contentious, we'll have a look at them! Keithlard 14:13, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
I have added the section on the mural but I cannot find a proper source except myself.I am Mark Francis and I painted it.--Streona (talk) 19:59, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Poplar Rates Rebellion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111007123041/http://www.merlinpress.co.uk/acatalog/GUILTY_AND_PROUD_OF_IT_.html to http://www.merlinpress.co.uk/acatalog/GUILTY_AND_PROUD_OF_IT_.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:29, 10 December 2017 (UTC)