Talk:Pornification
This page was proposed for deletion by Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contribs) on 3 August 2015 with the comment: Does not appear to be a notable term: i.e. an unremarkable neologism. It was contested by MelanieN (talk · contribs) on 2015-08-10 with the comment: declining prod; the term seems to be widely used. AfD remains a possibility. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Why should this be its own article?
editI'm really not seeing why this should be its own article instead of merged with the Pornography or Sexualization article. Sure, when citing WP:NEO, one can argue that it's a notable neologism, but one can also argue that, per WP:No page, that doesn't mean it needs its own article. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 02:12, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
This reads like a poorly written high school essay. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.108.175.194 (talk) 06:46, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Agreed that this article should be merged, per Flyer22 Reborn. -Crossroads- (talk) 04:11, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
ه
editCould someone please make this article better? Thanks, 184.19.98.82 (talk) 21:04, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
Reverse current redirect
edit"Pornographication" is not the correct term for the topic, which is pornification: the mainstreaming of porn.
- Barton, Bernadette (March 2021). The Pornification of America: How Raunch Culture Is Ruining Our Society. NYU Press. p. 232. ISBN 9781479894437.
Currently pornification redirects here, but it should be the other way. --WriterArtistDC (talk) 18:31, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Cleanup after move
editThe entire "History" section can be deleted, since it is a history of porn, not pornification, which is a 21st century concept.--WriterArtistDC (talk) 19:00, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Removed history, which contained the OR and lack of focus, so also removed maintenance tags.--WriterArtistDC (talk) 23:00, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Removed content not related to cited source
editContent that I had previously deleted as trivial and unsourced has been restored, with the addition of a citation that has nothing to do with the content, so I have again removed it. The new reference is about opposition to actual porn, not the pornification of mainstream culture.
I am sure there are sources that could be used to support content on the Evangelical viewpoint on pornification, but that would require thought. WriterArtistDC (talk) 02:23, 15 May 2023 (UTC)