Talk:Port Sanilac Light

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

categories

edit

I think it is properly categorized. Please remove that tag.7&6=thirteen (talk) 03:26, 21 February 2008 (UTC)StanReply

Picture needed

edit

This article would greatly benefit from a picture of this unique lighthouse. 7&6=thirteen (talk) 23:35, 20 February 2008 (UTC)StanReply

History needed

edit

I've put in lots of references and external links. We need someone else to glean a history (with appropriate references) from that material, presumably. This article is short in that department. Compare the Terry Pepper article and see for yourself. Thanks. 7&6=thirteen (talk) 22:11, 27 February 2008 (UTC)StanReply

Question

edit

Does the fourth order Fresnel lens and light beam have a range of 13 miles, or 16 miles? The article currently uses both numbers. This is significant because of the light's range was 16 miles in all directions, then it could have completely closed the 30-mile darkness gap along the shore of Michigan's Thumb that was the reason for the light's construction. Bigturtle (talk) 22:13, 28 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Port Sanilac Light. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:29, 24 May 2017 (UTC)Reply