Talk:Porter station/GA1

Latest comment: 8 years ago by D'SuperHero in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: D'SuperHero (talk · contribs) 05:55, 4 January 2016 (UTC)Reply


Will review it. SuperHero👊 05:55, 4 January 2016 (UTC)Reply


Lead

 Y Seems fine but the words "rapid" and "deepest" must be reworded. SuperHero👊 08:17, 7 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

History

 Y Good work with this section and other subsections in it but keep limited images to the section as it gets difficulty in reading.

Arts on the line

 Y Fair work.

Accessibility

 Y Good one, needs bit elongation.

Bus connections

 Y Fine but needs a touchup to some.

References and External links

 Y No deadlinks found. SuperHero👊 14:01, 9 January 2016 (UTC)Reply


GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  

Passing it as a Good Article. Can be made more better further but as for now its eligible as a GA according to the work by its nominator. SuperHero👊 11:58, 14 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.