Talk:Portrait of Winston Churchill (Sutherland)

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Insult#Backhanded compliment|backhanded compliment]] The anchor (#Backhanded compliment) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Destruction

Latest comment: 7 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion

According to the Sutherland bio article, the Churchill portrait was destroyed on the orders of Clemmie Churchill. According to this article, there is now evidence that the destruction was approved by her after it had happened. Both articles cannot be correct. - Sitush (talk) 14:00, 2 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Yes, the contradiction remains. Martinevans123 (talk) 14:10, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

But not entirely contradictory as the main body says "the painting was subsequently destroyed on the orders of Lady Spencer-Churchill", which is supported by the source here. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:30, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic