Talk:Portuguese Malacca

Portugal Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Portugal To-do:

Find correct name The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere. The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.

Improve key articles to Good article

Improve

Review

Category:History of Portugal: lots to remove there
Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).

Requests

See Requested articles

Assess

Help assessing articles.

Need images

Translate from Portuguese Wikipedia

Wikify

Vote:

Watch this list — Edit this list

Malaysia High‑importance

	Malaysia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Malaysia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Malaysia and Malaysia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MalaysiaWikipedia:WikiProject MalaysiaTemplate:WikiProject MalaysiaMalaysia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Former countries

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles

Under construction

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Under construction please bear with me

--Bukhrin 06:19, 13 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

WPFC: status

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Under the WPFC, will expand later (say in a couple of days), will change the class to Start and maybe ask for review. My current estimate for this is around 11-15 % completion. Please edit/review spellings, grammar as we go along, Thanks!

--Bukhrin 18:47, 21 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Merger proposal

Latest comment: 3 years ago6 comments6 people in discussion

I propose to merge A Famosa into Portuguese Malacca. I think that the content in A Famosa can easily be explained in the context of Portuguese Malacca, and the latter article is of a reasonable size that the merging of the former will not cause any problems as far as article size is concerned. Pakbelang (talk) 09:10, 29 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Both of these articles have very distinct topics and scopes. One is a building and one is a historical polity. I don't see how a merger works effectively, and this article could easily reach a decent size without such a merger. Template:Malaysian colonial architecture also shows we have articles on at least two other Portuguese-era buildings. CMD (talk) 09:30, 29 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Completely Against these articles, while related, should not be merged at all. A Famosa is a notable landmark in a city and the other article, as CMD said, is on a historical political subdivision. Cristiano Tomás (talk) 06:45, 30 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Oppose: No, I don't think it's a good idea either, for the reasons already stated. But there may be some merit in merging the content here in the 'Fortaleza de Malaca' section to the 'A Famosa' page, as it would fit better there. Moonraker12 (talk) 14:10, 31 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Completely oppose these two articles are completely two different entity which falls under two different WikiProject (Geography and Architecture). One has a complete set of settlement infobox and the other as a complete set of structure-related infobox. Each parameter in these infobox are of the very interest of every single Wikipedia reader. Chongkian (talk) 00:15, 22 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Closing, given a clear consensus not to merge. Klbrain (talk) 17:27, 14 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic