![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Poseidon bubble. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101126094618/http://newmont.com/about/history to http://www.newmont.com/about/history
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:16, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
ASX in 1969?
edit"From October to December 1969 the ASX All Mining index rose by 44%."
The ASX did not exist until 1987, so what's the source for this? Grassynoel (talk) 22:41, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- All articles have edit history, you can check the differences for the now twenty year old article, and identify when the statement went in and who wrote it. In most cases for an article this old, it will not have currently active editors to check with, as attrition is high. If there is not a 'live' editor who will respond, the next thing is to remove the statement from the article, and in your edit summary state that it had been discussed here. Any further issues - please ask. JarrahTree 01:43, 19 July 2024 (UTC)