Talk:Posidonia Shale

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Posidonia Shale. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110930132528/http://www.urweltmuseum.de/website/museum/index.htm to http://www.urweltmuseum.de/website/museum/index.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:11, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Article is not ready

@Yewtharaptor:, the article is far from ready and especially there are 131 unformatted references, the text is a mess with many typos, spelling mistakes up to outright incomprehensible text. Please work on this before adding yet more information. Ask @Hemiauchenia: for assistance and mentoring, the status of the article about this most important Lagerstätte is just not adequate enough. I did some quick editing now. Cheers, Tisquesusa (talk) 14:45, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

@Tisquesusa: Maybe that´s why i ask for help on various social media...did you see the old version? It was an abomination (When we are talking about a really important Fm). It needs all the work everybody can provide (THANK YOU FOR YOUR HELP!!). There is a lot of work to be done.

Yewtharaptor (talk) 16:55, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Sachrang Formation is the same

@Tisquesusa:,@Hemiauchenia: According to the Stratigraphic Table Of Germany (2016 and 2018), the Sachrang Formation is the same as the Posidonia Shale, being a Black Shale invasion o the Ällgau Profile. Also recommend to put all the names of the Posidonia: Sachrang Formation, Posidonia Shale, Posidonienschiefer Formation, Schwarzerschiefer and Ölschiefer Formation, mostly to evade confusion. (talk) 18:44, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Posidonia Paleomap.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:32, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Wikilinks format

Many, if not most of the wikilinks present on this page are poorly formatted by beginning with an Uppercase while being located in the middle of the text. This is not necessary, nor a standard style (WP:MOS) recommended by Wikipedia. Most of the common names: chemical compounds, minerals names are normally starting with a lowercase. For fossile species and living creatures, perhaps an Uppercase is acceptable, but the style has to be consistent all over the page. For geological formations, OK, an Uppercase is correct. The correction of the wikilinks format will require some work and time. Better to avoid useless revert and edit warring for that. Just to be certain that the main contributors to this page agree on this point. Shinkolobwe (talk) 11:08, 25 February 2022 (UTC)