Talk:Post-translational modification

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Genetics task force (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as High-importance).

Text and/or other creative content from Side chain modification was copied or moved into Post-translational modification with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

template

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This page is full of pictures so I will not add the ((MolBioGeneExp)) template. if this is not the case plz add --Squidonius (talk) 17:00, 6 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Correct Spelling

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

What is the correct spelling: posttranslational, post-translational, post translational? This article uses at least two of these. I find little consistency throughout the literature as well. Any input?--Nick Y. (talk) 16:10, 8 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

I think the hyphen improves readability and helps distinguish it from post-transcriptional or co-translational. I think post translational should not be used.--ChiBeta (talk) 02:32, 16 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

GeneticCode21-version-2.svg confusing

Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Genetic code graphic figure GeneticCode21-version-2.svg is confusing in this context. Though not quite as bad as the use on the Genetic_code page, to me (a non-expert) this figure implies a relationship between the genetic code and post-translational modification which (as far as I can tell) doesn't exist in the natural genetic code. My initial interpretation was "oh, so the redundant codons actually specify posttranslational modifications." I can understand the desire for a sexy graphic instead of boring tables, but IMO this page would be improved by simple deletion of that figure. Robertmacl (talk) 12:53, 13 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

That figure is really intended to illustrate which mRNA codons code for which amino acids, with the notes about which residues undergo PTM being secondary to the main point. Still, I think that it's helpful to have the specific modifications organized by amino acid the way the figure does, so I would suggest that we leave it in the article. Rob Hurt (talk) 13:40, 13 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

I have added a table that covers all the modifications in the figure and some others, listed by AA residue. I then removed the figure from view as most of it is not relevant to the content of this article.ChiBeta (talk) 04:06, 3 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Post-translational modification/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Changed rating to "high" for consistency with post-transcriptional modification. - tameeria 00:28, 19 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Substituted at 01:10, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Add topic