Talk:Post (Björk album)/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jennica (talk · contribs) 02:50, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Comments by Jennica

• Rename "Commercial reception" to "Commercial performance" and move it below "Accolades" but keep it a level [2] subheader.

Fixed

• Personnel should go under the track list.

Fixed

• Critics list is very long.. I'm not sure if it should go at the bottom or not. Maybe someone else can chime in.

Maybe moving it to the bottom like in the Illmatic article? I put it there because I thought it would look better under "Legacy"

• Change the "Recorded" field in the infobox to "Studio ="

Fixed

Hi Jennica, any news? I hope I'm not bothering you --Bleff (talk) 00:48, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Bleff - I did this before I really knew what a GA review is.. I thought it was more of a peer review and I did the same on another one and was talked to about it by another user. Now I don't know where to go to from here. I don't think I am apt to review it properly and I apologize. --Jennica✿ / ^talk 00:53, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Jennica, that's ok. I'll write a new section at the discussion page to see if another user can take over the review. Regards, --Bleff (talk) 01:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Comments by Finnusertop (non-reviewer)

There's a hefty amount of CS1 errors (see the article's hidden categories) that ought to be fixed. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 03:10, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.