Talk:Postage stamps and postal history of Pakistan
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from Postage stamps of Pakistan was copied or moved into Postage stamps and postal history of Pakistan with [permanent diff this edit]. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Note for future work
editNote for future work: User:Rzafar/Sandbox is a more comprehensive writeup that should eventually be incorporated. Stan (talk) 03:12, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Postal history
editMoved the previous article to a separate page to make it more comprehensive and give space for postal history here.Rzafar (talk) 20:14, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
Name and coverage
editNB. See also : discussion at Philately project talk page.
Having moved the stamp material out of this article into Postage stamps of Pakistan, this page should no longer be called Postage stamps and postal history of Pakistan if it is not to cover stamps, other than in passing. The postal history should be moved to Postal history of Pakistan and this page become a dab page. Right now this article covers much of the same information also covered in Postage stamps of Pakistan. This need to be fixed as we are not going to have 2 stamp articles for the same country; the coverage of each needs to be defined clearly. ww2censor (talk) 13:33, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
- I agree that there should be either two articles (Postal history of Pakistan, Postage stamps of Pakistan), or just one Postage stamps and postal history of Pakistan. --Michael Romanov (talk) 01:45, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
- The two articles Postage stamps and postal history of Pakistan and Postage stamps of Pakistan have much common ground. The latter is the more developed article but it covers more than just postage stamps and so the sensible solution is to merge them and retain the wider title. This is being progressed via WP:MM. ----Jack | talk page 05:41, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
Done. ----Jack | talk page 09:09, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
- Good job, well done Jack. ww2censor (talk) 14:29, 1 October 2010 (UTC)