Talk:Postpartum confinement
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): HSLMASY.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:36, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Redirecting for now
edit@GeorgineLeung: @Bazj: I've redirected this for now, but offhand I can see postpartum confinement meriting its own article. For some reason I'd like to say that this is practiced in places other than East Asia, although admittedly I'm drawing on some dusty memory from one of my anthropology or religion classes from college so I could be wrong on that. Even so, I can see this meriting its own article at some point as long as Georgine could produce enough sourcing to justify this. I'll drop a note at the applicable WikiProjects asking for help. If/when this gets more sourcing, I have no problem with this getting un-redirected. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:36, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- The subsection at Postpartum_period#East_Asia has other cultures that do the same, so I can see where this could potentially be considered redundant information. Still, worth checking just to make sure. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:38, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- The CSD nomination was facially invalid, and the nom in question (who is experienced enough to know better) ought to be ashamed of making such an obvious mistake. This has 600 words; the other section contains 133. Four times the number of words does not qualify for {{db-g10}}, even if we pretend (and we can't) that the title wasn't a valid redirect. This is, in fact, a perfectly good start to a desirable article. We should keep it and expand it. WhatamIdoing (talk) 16:01, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Are you kidding me?
editThey don't wash for 30 (or more) days? Wow. Then after that they suddenly "make contact with water" in hope of washing off the accumulated 30-days old filth? Can't be! It might have been apparent in ancient China where everyday toilet wasn't that important, but this can't be true in XXI century. 116.236.205.123 (talk) 08:11, 13 June 2017 (UTC)CommieBandito
Globalise
editI've done what I can to bring in other cultures, but this article could do with a lot more examples, and a theoretical overview. Carbon Caryatid (talk) 12:29, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:51, 19 November 2019 (UTC)