Talk:Potteries Shopping Centre

Contradiction Tag

How can a decision have been made to build the centre in 1950 yet it did not open untio 1988? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Restraining (talk • contribs) 15:34, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

There is no contradiction here. The City Counsel does not necessarily make decisions on private enterprize. It may also have taken many years to secure the promises from businesses to inhabit and make promisories to a new center before contruction even begins. Construction of this magnitude (in those days) could take many, many years, and how long did the property remain vacant before a decision was made to build a new shopping center? Was there something in it's place that had to be removed before hand? These are all issues that can take multiple years of discussion before any construction even begins. it is not a contradiciton, and the tag was removed. Kjnelan (talk) 00:13, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No consensus to move. MikeLynch (talk) 08:33, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

---

Potteries Shopping Centre → Intu Potteries – The centre officially became IntuPotteries in early 2013, as with most of the buildings that Intu which have been renamed to include the new "Intu" name. The centre is no longer referred to as "The Potteries Shopping Centre" and all traces of that name have been removed from the building itself. CaptainRiggers (talk) 19:26, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

• Thanks. Do we have sources for that assertion? Or is it OR?--Epeefleche (talk) 23:56, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
• It's referred to by the new name[1], but the old name may still be WP:COMMONNAME - we have an Intu Lakeside article, but the Trafford Centre and Braehead, which have also had similar official renames recently, are still at their old titles and unlikely to be moved. Peter James (talk) 18:18, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
• Oppose per COMMONNAME. Note that Intu Lakeside was moved without discussion/consensus and probably should be moved back. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 17:55, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
• Oppose per Lugnuts.--Epeefleche (talk) 17:57, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
• Oppose, absent support for usage change assertion. ENeville (talk) 17:24, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
• Oppose. Shopping centres often change ownership and corporate rebrandings frequently fail to catch on - look at the way many of The Mall Fund's new names never caught on with the public at large and got reverted as soon as ownership changed again. The onus must be to show the new version has taken effect outside the owning company. Other Intus like Lakeside and Uxbridge have been moved without discussion more than once and should be reverted pending evidence of the new name being actually used. Timrollpickering (talk) 18:26, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Broadmarsh which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 22:45, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Westfield Derby which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 23:14, 4 November 2015 (UTC)