Talk:Power-off accuracy approach

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 January 2020 and 13 March 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mnqly14.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:38, 18 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Feedback on your article

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

@Mnqly14: Nice to see you building something up from scratch? I guess you're a pilot or interested in flying?

I made a series of small changes to your article and I renamed it so that it matches the Wikipedia rules on article names. You can look through the history to get a sense of what I was up to.

The big issue is that the article basically relies on a single source. Even if it's just to establish the notability of the subject I think you would really benefit from adding at least 2-3 more reliable sources that discuss or define the subject.

Otherwise, I think this is a pretty good start on your article. You should take a look at this list of suggestions for polishing your article which is helpful. Try to add a few sources, do a final pass and try to address any of those things that you think are useful. Then go ahead and create the article live in Wikipedia. Good luck! —mako ๛ 00:01, 14 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Benjamin Mako Hill: Hi Mako! Thank you for the review. I took your advice into consideration and made some minor changes to my article. Let me know if you think it's ready to be moved over. --Mnqly14 (talk) 00:04, 16 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic