Talk:Power ISA

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Power ISA article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Computing: Software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Electronics Low‑importance

	Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

not clear about compliancy levels

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

" Features must be implemented in their entirety even if they are used as optional. " - this is not entirely clear. it seems to imply that even optional sections are in fact mandatory, which would seem... anomalous Lkcl (talk) 21:25, 8 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

i went with "* Optional features, if chosen, must be implemented in their entirety (partial implementation of an Optional feature is not permitted)" https://libre-soc.org/irclog/%23libre-soc.2021-05-08.log.html#t2021-05-08T22:33:46 Lkcl (talk) 12:01, 9 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Power ISA developed by Power.org?

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

In these edits, @Ipr1 requested a citation for "[The Power ISA] was originally developed by the now defunct Power.org industry group.", saying "architecture was started by IBM in early 1990s and the group was started in early 2000s".

This is more of a case for Template:Clarify than Template:Citation needed. What happened was:

IBM developed the IBM POWER instruction set architecture (all caps "POWER") as part of a project that started at the Thomas J. Watson Research Center and that produced the first IBM RS/6000 systems and the POWER1 processor, and successors;^[1]
the AIM alliance took the POWER ISA, made some changes. and produced the PowerPC instruction set architecture (with a common subset of the two instruction sets allowing code to be generated that will run on POWER ISA or PowerPC processors, and with at least some compilers having that as a target option for the code generator) - IBM eventually went with the PowerPC ISA, rather than the POWER ISA, for RS/6000 systems, with the POWER ISA becoming a "legacy" ISA;
some group (Power.org?) took the PowerPC ISA and the embedded Book E spinoff, merged them into a single ISA, possibly made some other changes, and the result was the Power ISA (not-all-caps "Power").

Using both "POWER" and "Power" did not help keep things easily understood.

(Also, the project that led to the POWER ISA started in the mid-1980's, apparently.^[2]) Guy Harris (talk) 08:36, 6 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

References

^ Cocke, J.; Markstein, V. (January 1990). "The evolution of RISC technology at IBM" (PDF). IBM Journal of Research and Development. 34 (1): 4–11. doi:10.1147/rd.341.0004.
^ Oehler, R. R.; Groves, R. D. (January 1990). "IBM RISC System/6000 processor architecture". IBM Journal of Research and Development. 34 (1): 23–36. doi:10.1147/rd.341.0023.

Add topic

[1] Cocke, J.; Markstein, V. (January 1990). "The evolution of RISC technology at IBM" (PDF). IBM Journal of Research and Development. 34 (1): 4–11. doi:10.1147/rd.341.0004.

[2] Oehler, R. R.; Groves, R. D. (January 1990). "IBM RISC System/6000 processor architecture". IBM Journal of Research and Development. 34 (1): 23–36. doi:10.1147/rd.341.0023.

[1]

[2]