Talk:Power Stone (video game)

Meaning of this phrase?

Capcom announced in February 2006 that it will port the entire series to the PSP with a few enhancements with a Q4 2006 release. The original Powerstone will include the four new characters introduced in Powerstone 2 for example.

So it's being retroactively released two years ago? Huh?

I'm not sure what your question is. Q4 2006 hasn't happened yer. Ace of Sevens 01:52, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

PSP

it is said that power stone one and two will be on the psp http://dreamcast.ign.com/articles/731/731883p1.html MetalBladeX4 22:58, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Play style, capsule review

The best analogy to how PS1 plays would be a classic Jackie Chan movie. You have to take advantage of the room, obstacles, and weapons in order to win. At times, you'll fight, dodge, tear the room apart to find stuff, toss furniture to stall your opponent, or make a mad dash for the final power stone. Simple one button counters are reasonable to pull off, which may toss the attacker in a different corner of the arena, where they might then find a good item! There are so many opportunities to flip the tide of battle that a new player can still have a good time while losing most matches.

The sequel has a completely different feel to it, which I found competent but less fun. It's worth having around for the 4 player element, and the new dynamic arenas, where the players may find a greater danger from the arena itself. I found that #2 doesn't give the same hectic pace that #1 offers, and it feels less friendly to new players.

The worst crime is that these games haven't been ported to a new console. The PSP port misses the point - Power Stone is best as a party game, with everyone crowded around a big TV fighting over who goes next, and indulging vices with the outcome of each match. If Nintendo were to put it on a disk with Smash Bros, I would never change disks again.

68.0.226.163 (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 07:44, 11 January 2009 (UTC).

ESRB rating

the infobox says 'E' but the image clearly shows 'T'. Thoughts? --DesireCampbell 08:21, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

• Don't know where the info came from, but it's fixed. -Platypus Man | Talk 01:42, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Power Stone not included in Capcom franchise

Hey PowerStone isn't included in the Capcom franchise bar on the bottom, shouldn't that be fixed, seeing as it is apart of the Capcom franchise? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.54.106.64 (talk) 10:59, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Actors play which characters?

Actors should be listed next to which character they voiced. Could someone please update this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.91.24.138 (talk) 20:08, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Power Stone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100914102236/http://www.capcom.co.jp/newproducts/consumer/powerstone/ps1/index.html to http://www.capcom.co.jp/newproducts/consumer/powerstone/ps1/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:53, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Requested move 9 October 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) JuniperChill (talk) 00:29, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

---

Power Stone (video game) → Power Stone – Clear primary topic. The other entries (seen on Power Stone) are either derivatives of Power Stone (video game) or don't exist as an article anyway (i.e. Power Stone (Marvel Cinematic Universe)). Sceeegt (talk) 00:06, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

• Oppose The Power Stone is one of the Infinity Stones and that article gets an absolutely tremendous amount of views that dwarfs the article on the video game or series, which are old and obscure Dreamcast games. Without evidence that the Marvel Power Stone can't be an equivalently primary topic, I'd oppose this. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 08:18, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

  You're forgetting that the Marvel Power Stone does not exist as an article, it is a redirect. Therefore it weakens its case as being primary. Sceeegt (talk) 14:28, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

• Oppose, no PRIMARY.--Ortizesp (talk) 14:17, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
• Oppose. Not the primary topic. No evidence in support of that claim. Gonnym (talk) 16:12, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

  Evidence. Even without the spike, the Power Stone (video game) constantly gets almost 10x more views than other entries. Sceeegt (talk) 16:15, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.