This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rome, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the city of Rome and ancient Roman history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomeWikipedia:WikiProject RomeTemplate:WikiProject RomeRome articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greek history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
A fact from Praefectus vigilum appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 May 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Latest comment: 1 year ago7 comments3 people in discussion
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
... that the praefectus vigilum during the Great Fire of Rome(pictured) under Nero is unknown? Source: Daugherty (1992) p. 235 Jstor "The only Roman official mentioned in the context of firefighting is Ofonius Tigellinus (Tac. Ann. 15.40.3), who at the time was the praefectus praetori"
ALT1... that the praefectus vigilum commanded seven cohorts of 560 or 1,000 firefighters, each responsible for two regions of Rome? Source: Daugherty (1992) p. 230 Jstor "The cohortes vigilum or vigiles were led by the praefectus vigilum" "Seven tribunes led each of the seven cohorts. These consisted of either 560 or 1000 men" " the City was divided into 14 regions and ... each Cohort seems to have been responsible for two of them."
Hi Alessandro57 (talk), review follows: article created 14 April and exceeds minimum length; A few queries on sourcing:
Sorry, not familiar with Roman documents on Wikipedia. Is the way they have been cited here in line with best practice? To a layman it doesn't provide much of a clue where to go to verify the information
What makes https://www.ostia-antica.org/ a reliable source? I couldn't find an "about us" page, I see it mentions the "Parco Archeologico di Ostia Antica" is it produced by them?
You are missing a citation for "The troops received accommodation in the city and were paid from the state treasury"
You have not cited the last 15 entries on the list of prefects
Do you mean primary sources (Suetonius, Tacitus, etc.)? Yes, this is the way: if one want to check them, one usually goes to wikidata or to the author's article, and there one finds the links to the works. If one is in a hurry, with google one usually lands on the right liber.
This website has existed for at least 20 years and contributors are mainly archaeologists working on the excavations in Ostia Antica. The site is extremely professional.
This sentence came from the original translation, so it was unsourced. I researched, integrate it with new info and sourced it.
Also these entries came from another wiki (it) and, as it happens most of the cases there, were unsourced :-(. I could now reference most of them. Regarding the couple without reference, I will search this weekend too, if I won't find anything I will remove them.
Hallo, @Dumelow: , I cleaned up the list, everything is referenced now. Moreover, I reorganized the article and added some more info. You can go ahead now. Thanks, Alex2006 (talk) 06:21, 25 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hi Alessandro57 (talk), review follows: article created 14 April and exceeds minimum length; A few queries on sourcing:
That's all for now, Ave atque vale :-) Alex2006 (talk) 13:45, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Good work Alex2006, the hook facts check out to Daugherty (1992), I didn't spot any issues with overly close paraphrasing. Looks fine to me - Dumelow (talk) 11:16, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
