Talk:Pre-existing disease in pregnancy

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 5 January 2022 and 4 April 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Tatijohnson1 (article contribs).

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 August 2021 and 21 September 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Thrombocytopenic, Singh.med. Peer reviewers: Julijewelz.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:38, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Intercurrent disease in pregnancy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080705032759/http://www.icsi.org/prenatal_care_4/prenatal_care__routine__full_version__2.html to http://www.icsi.org/prenatal_care_4/prenatal_care__routine__full_version__2.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:17, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 21 June 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: page moved by consensus. I note many previous moves, but could not find the one referred to below from the previous page name. In any case hopefully this will now lead to stability. Andrewa (talk) 19:40, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

---

Intercurrent disease in pregnancy → Pre-existing disease in pregnancy – Was the previous page name; an intercurrent disease means a disease that exists along with another disease which pregnancy is not Iztwoz (talk) 17:32, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

• Support apart from anything else, "Preexisting disease in pregnancy" is much easier to understand for lay readers. --Tom (LT) (talk) 15:48, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

---

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Peer Review 2021

Feedback on Abu T's Contribution to the article "Depression in Pregnancy":

- Supported statements using a peer reviewed article that is secondary, not primary

- No grammatical errors present

- Excellent job restating secondary sources without plagiarism evident

- Neutrality maintained

- No jargon used

- Is there anything in particular you want feedback on?

- I like that you focused on patient/physician partnership and the vital need for shared agenda setting. That being said, I think that statement is skewed towards healthcare providers; the average person reading this section would be a layman.

- I don't see much talk about non-pharmaceutical interventions - cognitive behavioral therapy for example or electro-convulsive therapy (not sure this is used)

- Maybe include criteria for depression? Does it differ in pregnant women?

- Very comprehensive work plan - link here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mroy3kA2Wli62LqSQLoGZSsEfyJni9hxjUSh-4q4w-I/edit

Etopn23 (talk) 18:11, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

- Great use of links for more resourcesCiaranmurph (talk) 18:13, 13 September 2021 (UTC)ciaranmurph

Feedback on Ricky's contribution to Chronic Hypertension

- good grammar and clear information presented

- citations are valid

- very neutral

- would recommend hyperlinking some of the words to different Wikipedia articles (ie: preeclampsia, cesarean delivery)

- perhaps add names of antihypertensives for examples and clarification in order to prevent jargon

Great work and additions! Would just ensure that anything else you add it clear for all audiences and is explained without jargon.

Figsaregreen2 (talk) 18:20, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

- Great updates - very comprehensive. I like how you have lots of links to related topics. It's very neutral and relatively easy to understand without knowing medical language. I think adding a couple of images of some of the diseases mentioned could be helpful.

Suggest adding section on Neurological Conditions and include entry on epilepsy

Epilepsy affects over 1 million people who can bear children in the U.S. [8]. A consortium of epilepsy and reproductive care providers have recently consolidated up-to-date research about epilepsy and pregnancy, including related to anti-seizure medications, on a website aimed at both patient and clinician audiences. The site aims to correct misconceptions about safety issues and risks associated with bearing children if you have epilepsy. Adding a section on neurological conditions with an entry on epilepsy would give people with epilepsy and their doctors a reliable place to start researching the implications of getting pregnant while managing epilepsy and medications taken to control it.

−

Existing text: N/A

+

Proposed text: With proper care and planning, people with epilepsy can have safe, healthy pregnancies and healthy babies. The Maternal Outcomes and Neurodevelopmental Effects of Antiepileptic Drugs (MONEAD) study showed that with appropriate epilepsy care, pregnant people with epilepsy are no more likely to experience an increase in seizure frequency while pregnant than non-pregnant people are.[https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaneurology/fullarticle/2789145]https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaneurology/fullarticle/2789145 People with epilepsy should switch to anti-seizure medications (ASMs) with the lowest risk for major congenital malformations as well as the least risk of adverse [[Neurodevelopmental disorder|neurodevelopmental outcomes]] (e.g., lower IQ or autism spectrum disorder) before conceiving, if possible. They should also work with their healthcare providers to identify the lowest effective ASM dosage that will maintain their seizure control while regularly checking medication levels throughout pregnancy.[https://epilepsypregnancy.com/]https://epilepsypregnancy.com/

RobertAtkinson (talk) 22:14, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Your organization's web site does not meet the requirements set out in WP:MEDRS for sourcing biomedical content. We cannot use it as a source, nor can we use the single studies you are otherwise citing. MrOllie (talk) 22:18, 30 October 2023 (UTC)