Talk:Precipitationshed

Request for comment

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

I can't tell if this is a neologism or misspelling. All of the sources talk about watersheds. There are some articles on google about precipitationshed as a singular word, but many seem related to articles published in Sweden (ex http://www.stockholmresilience.org/21/news--events/seminar-and-events/whiteboard-seminars/9-27-2012-what-is-a-precipitationshed.html) and the author. Google even asks if I meant precipitation shed as two words. Another one uses it as a twitter hash tag (https://plus.google.com/+JeanBaptistePichancourt/posts/dSajj7daiii). Results from older literature use precipitation shed as two separate words, and start showing up on page 3 of google results (https://books.google.com/books?id=oh1aAAAAYAAJ&pg=RA1-PR5&lpg=RA1-PR5&dq=precipitationshed&source=bl&ots=JIY4yRhZU_&sig=1WR9_aPHYjG8tcIR7X8F8pDdKCU&hl=en&sa=X&ei=FAPWVPmOGoirogTz9oHwCw&ved=0CCYQ6AEwBTgU). The earliest source I see is from 2011, while older sources all (as far as I can tell) use it as two words. Expert opinion on the matter is required. ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 12:21, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

A google scholar search [1] on this term suggests that it is a very recent concept and is mainly (but not exclusively) used by Keys, van der Ent and their coworkers. Quoting from Keys et al. 2012 "The concept of the precipitationshed can be thought of as an “atmospheric watershed”. The precipitationshed is for precipitation dependent ecosystems what the surface watershed is for surface water dependent ecosystems (Fig. 1), and it is defined as the upwind atmosphere and upwind terrestrial land surface that contributes evaporation to a specific location’s precipitation (e.g. rainfall)." Mikenorton (talk) 13:45, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Seems it is a valid concept - don't know if perhaps a better name for the concept exists. I've tweaked a bit - finished a sentence and added the Keys et al. 2012 ref, chopped excess empty sections and rather irrelevant categories and see alsos. Vsmith (talk) 13:57, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

I'm Patrick Keys, and I started this article today. The word is a neologism, not a mis-spelling. The concept did not exist prior to its formal publication in 2012. Since its first publication in 2012, its been mentioned and cited by scientists working on similar topics (evaporative source region analysis, moisture recycling, etc). It is still a relatively new idea, however, which means that there may be a lag before the broader community picks up the concept. I am hoping to edit this over the coming week to ensure that it meets Wikipedia's standards.User:Pkeys1018

Thank you for your honesty Patrick. You may want to look at WP:NEO for guidance on whether or not it is time yet for the article, or where you may improve. Specifically "Neologisms are expressions coined recently or in isolated circumstances to which they have remained restricted. In most cases, they do not appear in general-interest dictionaries, though they may be used routinely within certain communities or professions. They should generally be avoided because their definitions tend to be unstable and many do not last. Where the use of a neologism is necessary to describe recent developments in a certain field, its meaning must be supported by reliable sources." To be honest I do not know why you are trying to coin this new word, when precipitation shed as a two word phrase seems sufficient enough. But again, I am not an expert on the field. You may want to find sources unrelated to yourself for inclusion in citations, if you are editing the article yourself to avoid conflicts of interest. ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 07:27, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

• It looks like a neologism, a very clumsy construction used by a few authors to avoid the word "water" in "watershed". Kind of nonsensical, because although "precipitiation" consists of e.g. snow as well as rain; ultimately the snow melts and it is water that flows either side of a watershed (as drainage divide) or into a watershed (as a catchment area). --Bermicourt (talk) 14:46, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

  [The above comment by Bermicourt was moved here from Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Rivers, where it was originally placed in response to notice of this RfC being posted there.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼  07:25, 10 March 2015 (UTC)]

• Merge: Yeah, that looks like a bad band name. There are some cited sources that use it, but I'm having a hard time thinking of any reason not to merge this stub into the Watershed article, and just note the alternate, klugey term in that article.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼  07:19, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.