Talk:Preferred IUPAC name
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
2013 IUPAC Recommendations
editThe current version of the recommendations for Preferred IUPAC Names (PINs) in organic chemistry is presented in Nomenclature of Organic Chemistry – IUPAC Recommendations and Preferred Names 2013 (Blue Book).[1] The current article describes the situation in 2009. – Emeldir (talk) 13:07, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
- Updated (sort of) using the link. Thanks You for the suggestion! Perhaps You yourself would have done it better, but still… --Esmu Igors (talk) 15:49, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
References
- ^ Nomenclature of Organic Chemistry : IUPAC Recommendations and Preferred Names 2013 (Blue Book). Cambridge: The Royal Society of Chemistry. 2014. doi:10.1039/9781849733069-FP001. ISBN 978-0-85404-182-4.
Iupac name of proxyfan is having some small mistake
edit5-(3-phenylmethoxypropyl)-1H-imidazole 2409:4081:E98:D79A:0:0:BB89:DA12 (talk) 12:11, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
- @2409:4081:E98:D79A:0:0:BB89:DA12: do you have a source on that? -- Python Drink (talk) 21:44, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
How do you determine a PIN?
editBased on what I have seen, the determination is often arbitrary. Here is a stack exchange post over that.
So, should we state in the article that the PIN is determined by the IUPAC and not systematically obtained? BrightSunMan (talk) 19:11, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
Maths
editmaths is a thing in school 2A02:C7C:AD54:E800:2923:A537:D952:C504 (talk) 11:31, 23 August 2023 (UTC)