Talk:Prescription (sovereignty transfer)

Move to Prescription (international law)

It seems to me that this should be moved to Prescription (international law) and the example from Quebec moved somewhere else, probably to Adverse possession. --V111P 02:28, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Regarding the change (cur) (prev) 22:38, 12 February 2010 79.145.101.128 (talk) (3,792 bytes) (undo), I have to say that there are no clear references to support what was said on a non-pacific prescription.

Major Re-Write Needed This article opens with one topic -- prescription in international law -- and then switches to a totally different topic -- prescription within domestic property law -- and creates the erroneous impression that the latter explains or exemplifies the former. Also, since it discussions examples of prescription solely from civil law jurisdictions, it creates the false impression that prescription does not exist under common law regimes, which is not so. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.198.12.4 (talk) 15:43, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

I agree with the above and accordingly I have

• cut from prescription (sovereignty transfer)
• and pasted to easement by prescription.

jnestorius^(talk) 16:46, 30 April 2015 (UTC)