This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Royalty (a child project of the Royalty and Nobility Work Group), an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to British Royalty on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you should visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.British RoyaltyWikipedia:WikiProject British RoyaltyTemplate:WikiProject British RoyaltyBritish royalty articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago5 comments3 people in discussion
You've done a terrific job with this article Estar8806, though I'm a little bit unsure about its title. I don't know whether we should keep Camilla's name or not, because even though the service of thanksgiving was to mark her and Charles's coronation, the Honours of Scotland were presented exclusively to Charles. Even the article itself words it as such. The order of service on page 16 also outlines Presentation of the Honours of Scotland to His Majesty The King. Do you think that perhaps we should drop her name? Keivan.fTalk02:14, 15 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
I see. But dropping her name would not necessarily create inconsistency in article titles. We do have Proclamation of accession of Charles III and Camilla's name is nowhere to be seen. I think the title should be as accurate as possible and since the honours were not presented to Camilla then there's no point in keeping her name. I doubt anyone would oppose the change but I'd just wait a bit longer to see if anyone else has any comments. Keivan.fTalk02:39, 15 August 2023 (UTC)Reply