Talk:President (government title)

Proposed merge

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Following this discussion, the pages were merged to President. Cnilep (talk) 01:05, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

---

The article President (title) is an obvious though possibly unintentional content fork; the two articles serve the same purpose, though President (title) is more about usage. The information in it, to the extent it is sourced/sourceable, would be useful in this article. Finding this article, no one would ever look for President (title). It makes no sense at all as a disambiguation, since President is about the title. — SMcCandlish  Talk⇒ ɖ^⊝כ^⊙þ Contrib. 03:35, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Support merge. If at some point an "origin of the title" needs to be split off due to length, so be it, but for now I see no reason for both articles. —Kevin Myers — Preceding undated comment added 05:25, 23 January 2013

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Collective presidency

Add Bosnia and Herzegovina--Bancki (talk) 11:46, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Add Presidential Council (Benin) (197072)?--Bancki (talk) 10:05, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

A company begins with acting president A, then later president B.

Question: is president B the 1st or the 2nd president? 50.136.247.190 (talk) 07:55, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

It will depend on the internal regulations. Perhaps the company does not even bother to give any special treatment to its past history (such as keeping a gallery of former presidents), so the point would be moot. --Cambalachero (talk) 10:01, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:President (disambiguation) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 13:46, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 28 July 2021

"some sources maintain that living former U.S. presidents continue to be addressed as "Mr. President", both formally and informally, and some contemporary experts on etiquette maintain that it is entirely appropriate."

please remove this line above, the source is a contributor article from HuffPo and is 100% false and not a valid source, also the source mentions nothing of multiple contemporary experts.

There is only one president. Referring to multiple people as a sole position is factually inaccurate. If the math is not enough, According to the US government, the way to address a former president is Mr. (last Name).

https://www.usa.gov/presidents#item-36752 70.117.181.21 (talk) 03:19, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

 Done. Per WP:BURDEN, just the fact that it is cited to a generally unreliable source and that you've challenged it is enough to remove it. ‑‑Volteer1 (talk) 07:06, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Citation 17 no longer appears valid

FYI Citation 17 which directs to a US government page on Presidents no longer appears to have any information on addressing or contacting former Presidents or anything related to the proper title to use for them. It either should be removed or replaced. 2601:547:B05:4F51:A012:87C4:919B:3F50 (talk) 02:00, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

About the history of the title

I think the story of the title is quite poorly summarized. It only makes a mention of its etymology and then refers to the fact that the term "president" is used to translate some passages of the Bible. The Roman origin should be mentioned as an administrative position. Now, I know that most people are more familiar with the term "rector provinciae" as a synonym for "Roman governor" but it is my understanding that after the time of Tacitus (the historian), the terms "praeses" and "praesidens" began to be used with the same sense of "governor". Both words would be related although they would not be the same. The problem is that the only bibliography I have on this regard is in Spanish (not even in Italian, surprisingly). I only found one author who talks about the topic about the relationship between the words "praeses" and "praesidens" and I already referenced them on the Spanish Wikipedia in case you understand the language. I will also left the references here:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337997774_La_rivalidad_entre_praeses_y_praesidens https://www.academia.edu/49984415/El_origen_latino_de_algunas_denominaciones_de_gobernante_En_Espa%C3%B1ol

Apologies if I made a grammatical error. Bibliotecatdj (talk) 14:44, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

"Honorable" and "Excellency"

These are talked about but are not linked when mentioned and are also not included in "See also" section. Shouldn't they be? 2600:1012:A023:4FDC:713D:F52A:9E66:FD7A (talk) 04:35, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Seriously, if the article page is going to remain locked then actually answer when it is brought up in the talk page. 2600:1012:A021:4D69:485D:49E2:C7A2:B71D (talk) 05:21, 11 October 2024 (UTC)