This article is within the scope of WikiProject 2010s, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2010s on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.2010sWikipedia:WikiProject 2010sTemplate:WikiProject 2010s2010s articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Barack Obama, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Barack ObamaWikipedia:WikiProject Barack ObamaTemplate:WikiProject Barack ObamaBarack Obama articles
This article is within the scope of Smithsonian Institution WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Smithsonian Institution and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Smithsonian InstitutionWikipedia:GLAM/Smithsonian InstitutionTemplate:WikiProject Smithsonian InstitutionSmithsonian Institution-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Adding additional information around the reception of the painting. Also need to add more about the composition and Kehinde's ideas for presenting Obama in this style. Aconner3 (talk) 23:31, 20 October 2018 (UTC)aconner3Reply
Latest comment: 3 years ago5 comments5 people in discussion
Excuse me for asking, but why exactly was this page deemed necessary. None of the other presidential portraits have pages of their own as far as I am aware and it seems as this article is a stub, that not enough information exists about this particular painting for it to warrant its own page. What is the reasoning behind the pages existence?--Brboyle (talk) 20:47, 9 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
Quite a nerve to try to delete these two paintings' images and the two articles, and then complain on all four talk pages about them. For your information, Wikipedia doesn't care about consistency in a topic - that doesn't determine notability. Even if other presidential portraits don't have articles, these ones can. They have sufficient mentions in news, books, journals, etc. Please read Wikipedia:Notability. As well, the photos are under Wikipedia:Fair use: they are not freely licensed or in the Public Domain, but Wikipedia can use them in low resolutions to illustrate the topic being discussed. If you have any more fundamental questions about how Wikipedia works, I suggest you try the Wikipedia:Teahouse. ɱ(talk)23:19, 10 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
Delete, what separates this painting for Bill Clinton's or George W. Bush's, that it got brief attention when it was released? Inconsequential, and frankly a badly-written article all-together. --MyPreferredUsernameWasTaken (talk) 19:29, 20 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
