Talk:President of Austria/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Kavyansh.Singh (talk · contribs) 07:14, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Nominator: Colonestarrice (talk · contribs) at 22:11, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Comments

I am sorry, but this is going to be a quick-fail due to multiple of the following reasons:

1. The last GA review was in October 2020, which was failed by Hog Farm for many reasons, which are still not resolved. See Talk:President of Austria/GA1.
2. There is a lot of uncited text. Almost the entire "History" section, "Executive role", etc. have less or no citations at all. There are lot of good sources like [1], [2], [3], etc.
3. Suggesting to request a copy-edit at WP:GOCE/REQ. There are lot of prose and WP:MOS issues
4. Suggesting to remove the list of presidents, we have a separate article on that.

– Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 07:34, 2 March 2022 (UTC)