This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Regarding this, I have several objections. First, it's completely uncited. But second, even if we could find citations for it, it seems like it's only tangentially connected to the article's topic - it's not about the presidential reorganization authority, it's just something that could theoretically be done using it. On top of this, a quick search for sources suggests that either sources connecting it to the presidential reorganization authority are nonexistent (I only found Wikipedia mirrors mentioning Paul Miller or Paul D. Miller in connection to presidential reorganization authority), which would mean its connection to this topic is entirely WP:OR, or the entire thing is marginal to the point of having no significant coverage. The bare minimum to include is at least one source mentioning Paul D. Miller and the Presidential reorganization authority by name, surely? Preferably a WP:SECONDARY non-opinion source (ie. one not written by Miller), but I can't even find one written by Miller in a quick search. --Aquillion (talk) 05:10, 19 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
.svg)
