Talk:Pretty Little Head

McKay dropped

Nellie McKay has split with Columbia/Sony, who no longer plan to release Pretty Little Head. The article should make mention of this. I may add it myself later. Have to find the right links first.Bjones 13:42, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

mp3search.ru / gomusic.ru

I don't know if it's worth mentioning that her album being pre-emptively released by Columbia resulted in some websites (such as the two Russian ones above) ended up only offering the 16-track version but there it is. I just didn't want to assume it noteworthy and put it up there.

Fair use rationale for Image:PrettyLittleHead.jpg

Image:PrettyLittleHead.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:48, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Pretty little head.jpg

Image:Pretty little head.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:20, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Cover?

The article used to say that the Columbia release had the same packaging as the previous release, but this can't be true since the Columbia release has their logo right on the cover. Is the other faded white-bordered cover that is around the internet the pre-columbia release cover? TheHYPO (talk) 19:15, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Contradiction

The first and third paragraph seem to contradict each other. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.101.36.45 (talk) 10:40, 13 December 2008 (UTC)