Talk:Pretty on the Inside/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 21:14, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:16, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:16, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Well written, i made some minor copy-edits for style and grammar.[1] Complies sufficiently with the MoS

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   References appear to be Rs, support the statements, assume good faith for off-line sources, no evidence of OR.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Thorough without unnecessary trivia.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   NPOV

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Stable

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Suitable fair use rationales, captioned.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   In conclusion, I am happy to pass this as a good article. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 23:48, 14 March 2011 (UTC)