Talk:Prezi

Given that there is no credible evidence for any existing model of learning styles, recommending deleting the unsubstantiated claim that Prezi facilitates different learning styles.

Many of the references are dead web pages, for example, [11], [12], [13], [16], [18], [19], [20], [22], and [23]. Thus, IMHO, the claims referenced by these references are not very convincing! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Simkiott (talk • contribs) 22:20, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Article tone?

This article reads like an advertisement for Prezi in many places, except for the "Criticisms" section (which includes a strange sections defending one critic from criticisms of his criticisms of Prezi). More specifically, most of the article reads like Prezi's own webpage. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.208.215.220 (talk) 20:40, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

prezi as a common noun

I hear and see it quite often in Hungarian, used just like ppt. Is it used like that in English as well? Torzsmokus (talk) 09:47, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

As a mother-tongue English speaker currently living in Hungary, I can tell the answer is a simple "no", this shortening of "presentation" to "prezi" is very much a Hungarian thing, just like "hambi" for "hamburger" and all the other short "i" word-forms. For us English speakers it has no meaning. "Prezi" does exist in some (British?) dialects, but is short verbal (unwritten and perhaps slightly outmoded) form of "present" (i.e. "I gave her a nice prezi for her birthday"). I can recall old relatives saying this...80.254.148.123 (talk) 09:32, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

We certainly don't use "Prezi" with this meaning in Australia, although "prezzie" is commonly used to mean "present", as this BBC article attests: 176.63.196.139 (talk) 03:37, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

This wikipedia page shows the use of "prezzies" in australian english, defined as the diminutive of "presents" (gifts), with the comment "use widespread outside Australia" [1] --108.171.129.164 (talk) 08:49, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

References

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Prezi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://garr.posterous.com/have-you-ever-seen-a-great-talk-given-with-th
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://garr.posterous.com/on-train-to-tokyo-watching-one-of-the-best-te

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:33, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Tagged with {{advert}}

I tagged the article with {{advert}} because reading through the article, it seems to hawk its features a (particularly the "Prezi", "Prezi Next", and "Prezi Business" sections). There is still some informative material, but it would require some cleanup to meet Wikipedia's content guidelines. Awesome Aasim 19:07, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

The Tag disappeared, without any notice at the talk page (here), which is bad. I`ll check, how much the article changed from 2019 to now and if the changes do not address the problem, I will tag the article once more. Any thoughts on that? --Ai24 (talk) 01:49, 10 July 2021 (UTC)