Talk:Prhizzm

'Minerals' is an album, not an EP

The Minerals release constitutes a full album, not an EP, given that it is 12 tracks long and has a total run-time of 41 minutes. Also, all the rhetoric on the benbecula site advertises this release as "a full length album of oddities". See: http://www.benbecula.com/release/various/minerals_series.shtml

I gather this fact may have helped assuage certain concerns during the recent deletion debate. Out of hypersensitivity to maintaining a NPOV, I hesitate to make the change myself. I'll let the facts speak for themselves, and some kind soul speak for me. :) BFD1 20:15, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Post-script: to be fair, the article as it stands right now is misleading in that it suggests that the "first full-length" will be released in 2007. I submit that that line should be changed to read, "first full-length of new material" or something along those lines, if not removed entirely. Admittedly, I originally added it to the article in haste without fully considering the consequences. BFD1 20:22, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Fixed and fixed. Thanks for the info.  OZLAWYER  talk  12:25, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

John Hood Controversy

I really don't see what the John Hood controversy is doing on this page. The edits by User:BFD1 are an improvement, but I see no reason not to revert it straight back to the version of 2nd May 2007. Jonathan A Jones 13:49, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Indeed, there isn't even any commentary on the edits in the student newspaper article (such as whether they are "good" or not). He's edited plenty of other articles too. Seems useless information. I've removed it. Lexicon (talk) 14:49, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

File:PrhizzmEPcover.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:PrhizzmEPcover.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 14 February 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:PrhizzmEPcover.png) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 01:25, 14 February 2012 (UTC)