Talk:Price/Archives/2012
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Price. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Marxist/Marxian influence
The article claims, in regard to marginal benefit determining price, that: "That debate is no longer useful in talking about price."
It is true that marginal benefit is no longer seen as the sole driver of price; however, it is seen as driving the demand side of the supply-demand curves, the equilibrium of which determines price. I'll correct this if no objections are raised. El T 15:10, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
The comments on Marxian theories end with the sentence : 'Marxian theory has several flaws and has failed in practice.'. I don't understand what 'failed in practice' means here, and it would be more helpful to state what the flaws are. So I'm editing the sentence accordingly. Marinheiro 10:03, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
- The paragraph on Marxian price theory is utter and total crap; it ought to be revised completely. User:Jurriaan 2 february 2012 12:30 (UTC).
Too much garbage
This article has deteriorated from what we wrote originally. The section "Price as productive human labour time" is just rubbish and has nothing to do with Marx's theory. This article should be about how the concept of price is defined. Since there are different definitions in classical economics and neo-classical economics, those definitions should be separatedly acknowledged. User:Jurriaan 20:02 3 May 2010 (UTC)
- concurr, seems as an unattributed pastiche of autonomism Fifelfoo (talk) 11:39, 2 February 2012 (UTC)