Talk:Pride PAC

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Sulfurboy in topic Tags

Tags

edit
  • This article contains wording that promotes the subject in a subjective manner without imparting real information. (September 2017)
Read over it twice, don't see any peacock language. If I missed something please comment to let me know or better yet, just remove it.
  • This article may rely excessively on sources too closely associated with the subject, potentially preventing the article from being verifiable and neutral. (September 2017)
Relies on it for two citations, both claims which are pretty non-controversial. Five third party sources are incorporated.
  • This article's tone or style may not reflect the encyclopedic tone used on Wikipedia. (September 2017)
Reads fine to me, again if I missed something, let me know here or just remove it.
  • Some of this article's listed sources may not be reliable. (September 2017)
I didn't find any unreliable sourcing.

Sulfurboy (talk) 03:04, 2 September 2017 (UTC)Reply