Talk:Primary ideal
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Rschwieb in topic Why bother with radical?
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
I know the proof that
- if the radical of Q is maximal, then Q is primary.
I don't have the reference to confirm this, so I'm putting it for now. (Otherwise, I will forget.) -- Taku (talk) 00:10, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
The link to primal is incorrect, it point to algebraic geometry definition of primal, which is out of context. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.250.203.213 (talk) 06:45, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
Why bother with radical?
editIs it the case that for every primary ideal I, if xy is in I, either x^2 or y^2 is? This is clearly the case for primary ideals in Z. 130.132.173.59 (talk) 15:15, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
- Your proposition is trivially false for and for the primary ideal in the ring . Rschwieb (talk) 16:53, 12 September 2018 (UTC)