Talk:Prime Minister of Myanmar

4th Prime Minister Name is worong. Correct is USein Win (Brigadier General). May I pand maid yauhee padast smeda know how can I correct in BurmaPMs? --Ekyaw (talk) 19:48, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

New Constitution

The new constitution does not mention the office of Prime Minister, only the offfices of President and Vice President. It's likely to be abolished.--Tærkast (Communicate) 11:20, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

File:UNu-Dayan.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:UNu-Dayan.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests January 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:55, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Prime Minister of Myanmar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120509092134/http://mizzima.com/news/inside-burma/5085-thein-sein-sworn-in-as-burmas-president.html to http://www.mizzima.com/news/inside-burma/5085-thein-sein-sworn-in-as-burmas-president.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:04, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• Mgmgkha.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:23, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

1st August 2021 announcement

There's an edit war ongoing about who is Myanmar's Prime Minister. Since the coup d'etat, there are obviously 2 groups claiming legitimacy in governing the country. Wikipedia is not a battlefield. This page should reflect the dispute and not claim that the PM appointed by either the junta or the shadow government (NUG) is the official one. Bmaisonny (talk)

I agree with Bmaisonny's statement. Listing Min Aung Hlaing as the Prime Minister without mentioning NUG or underlying issues about the ongoing crisis is potentially misleading to the readers and does not reflect the Wikipedia's neutral stand on such matters. --Thein Lin Aung (talk)

Tartan357, your opinion is welcome. Htanaungg (talk) 04:13, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

It's absolutely absurd to claim the NUG is in government. The RS clearly state that there is a military dictatorship ruling Myanmar, and we go by what RS say, not what is "right"; see WP:TRUTH and WP:RIGHTINGGREATWRONGS. It is not Wikipedia's place to adjudicate legal disputes and determine who the rightful leader of Myanmar is; we simply state the facts as they are. This has been litigated ad nauseam at Talk:Aung San Suu Kyi (so much so that there's now an FAQ there). The formality of Min Aung Hlaing being named PM in addition to SAC chairman does not change anything about this situation. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 04:36, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

If RS report there is a military junta and a parallel civilian government, the article should reflect that. Putting legal or legitimacy issues aside, RS indicate that there are two governments (and hence two PMs) under contest. I see the current version of the article represents no such position. Thein Lin Aung (talk) 06:55, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

The RS report that there is a parallel government in exile, i.e. not in power. There is no scholarly dispute over who actually exercises power in Myanmar. It's unequivocally the military. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 06:59, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

User:Tartan357 Majority of RS report the claims from both SAC and NUG but do not imply which is the "true" government of Myanmar as it is not their position to do so. Regarding whether there is any dispute over who exercises power, RS report terrorizing actions of the military but it does not mean the dictatorship has state control necessary for a viable government. The current reports clearly indicates that there is dispute over the recognized government of Myanmar, both within the nation and internationally. Just because NUG is in exile does not settle such dispute. Thein Lin Aung (talk) 09:38, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

If the military dictatorship doesn't actually have state power, then show me one instance of the NUG exercising the force of law. Pretending the military is not in total control does a great disservice to the resistance movement and people around the world who are trying to understand what's happening in Myanmar. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 20:57, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

User:Tartan357 We could argue whether the dictatorship has political power/public obedience [1][2][3] but we will not because you are right in saying that the military has the ground control (by coercion). The actual politics and political titles such as PM is more complex than what we can settle here. So in the broad sense, it is correct to say there is a military dictatorship ruling. I only request it be made clear the PM title is self-appointed and originated from a coup de 'teat. I have voiced my opinion on this topic and have no further input until the situation changes. Thank you. Thein Lin Aung (talk) 06:12, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Theinlinaung2010, done. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 06:22, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Theinlinaung2010 Dear bro! you did fair point. Thanks you so much. I and other Burmese editors can't beat him because he is very experienced editor. Burmese political articles should be fair.Regards Taung Tan (talk) 14:06, 5 August 2021 (UTC)