Talk:Prince Louis of Luxembourg
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Prince Louis of Luxembourg article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
editDoes this article really fulfill encyclopedic criteria, how is this person noteworthy enough. All that information suits to his father's article, no need of separate one. Arrigo 18:16, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
He is noteworthy because he is a Prince of Luxembourg.
Succession rights
editWhy does Prince Louis give up succession rights upon marriage to Tessy and what does this mean for the Luxembourgish royal family? - GilliamJF 06:56, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
- It was Louis' personal choice to give up his rights, and he probably gave them up because of the circumstances of his marriage. However, it probably doesn't mean much for the family. Louis has two older brothers, as well as a younger brother and several male cousins, so there is no real threat to the dynasty. His son, Gabriel, has no rights, and will not have rights even after Louis and Tessy marry. Morhange 07:01, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
- Indeed, Gabriel would not have been in line to the throne, as he was born before his parents married. He would be considered illegitimate for succession purposes, even though his parents later married. Indisciplined 13:46, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Why was Prince Louis's wife and child (born in wedlock) denied the rank of prince/ss with personal attribute of royal highness. Is it because he married commoner.... ? other member of the family have married commoner and they were raised to rank of princess ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.203.116.154 (talk) 23:21, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Photograph
editThe photo of Prince Louis will be/is 7 years old of September 29, 2013, which seems rather old to me. Does anyone have an acceptable, newer photo of him that can be used legally? I checked the Commons photo lists, but there are no other photos of him available there. Nor is there a recent one for Princess Tessy. Metheglyn (talk) 06:01, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Try the new one I've put on. --79.64.100.136 (talk) 21:46, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Prince Louis of Luxembourg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090624030236/http://news.rtl.lu/news/national/28625.html to http://news.rtl.lu/news/national/28625.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130317083631/http://www.noblesseetroyautes.com/nr01/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/PPE121019126.jpg to http://www.noblesseetroyautes.com/nr01/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/PPE121019126.jpg
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:05, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Prince Louis of Luxembourg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928095128/http://www.grangettes.ch/clinic/modules/bamagalerie3/viewcat.php?id=166&cid=18&min=30&orderby=dateD&show=30 to http://www.grangettes.ch/clinic/modules/bamagalerie3/viewcat.php?id=166&cid=18&min=30&orderby=dateD&show=30
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071016053851/http://www.nettyroyal.nl/newssept07.html to http://www.nettyroyal.nl/newssept07.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:27, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:19, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:53, 24 January 2022 (UTC)