Talk:Princess Marina of Greece and Denmark

Latest comment: 4 months ago by Max2x4 in topic Who are what is "King"?


Comment

edit

Is it really necessary to include that her husband was bisexual?

It's well-known that he was under pressure to make a respectable marriage, because of the stories circulating about his private life. Valetude (talk) 00:15, 9 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Had interest in Horoscopes

edit

I have a letter from her Lady-in-waiting thanking my great grand mother for her horoscope. Roy Hurlstone

Wedding first known meeting of Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip

edit

Her wedding is the first recorded meeting of Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip (as Princess Elizabeth and Prince Philip) (stated in numerous biographies). I say 'first known' as in Gyles Brandreth's book 'Philip - the Final Portrait' Philp infers he and the Queen probably met before, but neither he nor the Queen could remember. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C6:D000:1C01:D39:4EA1:4CCE:FB50 (talk) 14:03, 7 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Post-niminal letters

edit
 

According to the photo I took few das ago (see right), post-nominal letters should follow her name.--Clithering 10:23, 27 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Ah, yes. Well, whilst she *has* post-nominal letters, they're not part of her name, so the BRoy Style guide omits them from the opening paragraph, in favour of listing them later (under Honours). If you feel that this is wrong, please do discuss. Cheers – DBD 14:45, 27 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Unofficial move proposal

edit

This page should be at Princess Marina of Greece and Denmark because the current title creates inconsistency with other foreign princesses who became British royal duchesses (Princess Frederica Charlotte of Prussia, Princess Victoria of Saxe-Coburg-Saalfeld - another Duchess of Kent, Princess Augusta of Hesse-Cassel, Grand Duchess Maria Alexandrovna of Russia, Princess Louise Margaret of Prussia, Princess Helena of Waldeck and Pyrmont, etc). I am not against putting titles gained by marriage in the title of article, but we should use her birth title for the sake of consistency. Surtsicna (talk) 22:31, 5 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Seeing as Princess Marina of Greece and Denmark is a redirect here, and therefore not ambiguous, I'd support this move per the guidelines DBD 00:26, 6 December 2008 (UTC)Reply
Agreed. Morhange (talk) 07:25, 6 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Princess Marina's religion

edit

I'm curious: did Princess Marina convert to Protestantism upon marriage to a Protestant prince or did she remain Eastern Orthodox for the rest of her life? Surtsicna (talk) 21:01, 7 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Duchess of Kent.jpg Nominated for Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:Duchess of Kent.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests January 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:15, 9 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Princess Marina of Greece and Denmark. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:07, 14 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Princess Marina of Greece and Denmark. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:36, 28 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Admiral?

edit

I see nothing in the article that suggests she actually held an admiral's rank, as opposed to a strictly honorary position. Mangoe (talk) 21:25, 21 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

She's wearing an admiral's uniform in one of the pictures. Celia Homeford (talk) 12:17, 22 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
Perhaps so, but the article on the WRENs says that someone else was the director/commandant at the time this picture was taken. Evidence suggests that her position was strictly honorary. Mangoe (talk) 17:54, 22 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
The Duchess of Kent was Commandant WRNS (equivalent to Rear-Admiral) from 1940 ("No. 34810". The London Gazette. 12 March 1940. p. 1470.). In 1951 the Director WRNS (equivalent to Commodore) was re-titled as Commandant, and the Duchess of Kent was given the title Chief Commandant ("No. 39215". The London Gazette. 27 April 1951. p. 2389.). Opera hat (talk) 11:30, 23 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:37, 25 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:37, 25 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned references in Princess Marina of Greece and Denmark

edit

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Princess Marina of Greece and Denmark's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Burke":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 11:04, 29 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:53, 16 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Lead image

edit

الاميره مارينا كانت جميله وانيقه لو غيرتم الصوره الشخصيه إلى صوره جديده لكان افضل 37.236.139.21 (talk) 04:03, 20 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Translated by Google as: Princess Marina was beautiful and elegant. If you changed the profile picture to a new picture, it would be better.
We are constrained by Wikipedia:Image use policy to use only free-use public domain files such as those in commons:Category:Princess Marina, Duchess of Kent. Celia Homeford (talk) 15:14, 21 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
I 100% agree. The image is not great. She was one of the most fashionable royals. There are so many gorgeous photos of her in tiaras & without tiaras. Could we do better? Lady Meg (talk) 09:16, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
edit

“Carl Theodor, Count…” leads to incorrect page ObserverGroup (talk) 11:30, 5 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

It links to Duchess Sophie Adelheid in Bavaria#Marriage and issue, which is a reasonably place to link. Celia Homeford (talk) 13:12, 5 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Who are what is "King"?

edit

Six of the footnotes consist solely of "King, p. 37" or some page number. But the article contains no original reference with enough detail to tell what is being cited. Max2x4 (talk) 01:15, 5 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Stella King's book is listed in the references. Celia Homeford (talk)