Talk:Print (magazine)

Fair use rationale for Image:Printmag.jpg

Image:Printmag.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:38, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Merger proposal

Print, A Quarterly Journal of the Graphic Arts describes the same magazine, in earlier times, as this one. I suggest we keep this page and bring the info on the other page here as a history of the magazine. Hotlorp (talk) 20:41, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

I (934C) am the main contributor to Print, A Quarterly Journal of the Graphic Arts - by way of background I am a book/art periodical collector. I have all of the early issues of "Print, A Quarterly Journal of the Graphic Arts" going into the more modern issues of "Print"

By the time the periodical had been bought out and became "Print" it had changed radically into just a trade journal explaining issues of advertising and commercial printing presses. It was no longer an "art journal" combining art and advertising.

I would be inclined to leave them separate. 934C (talk) 03:25, 28 September 2011 (UTC)934C

There are always changes of name, focus, and direction for a magazine, or any entity. Take a look at the page for practically any corporation that has existing over multiple decades. I suggest that these should be two sections of one article. —Shada Ng (talk | contribs) 00:55, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

After reading the comments, I (934C) as the primary author of "Print, A Quarterly Journal of the Graphic Arts" have deleted the material in "Print, A Quarterly Journal of the Graphic Arts" and merged it as suggested. I am not sure how to do a redirect from "Print, A Quarterly Journal of the Graphic Arts" to the current article.934C (talk) 02:17, 3 October 2011 (UTC)934C