Talk:Privacy in file sharing networks

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

This article is fine. There are no suggestions in the discussion part because the page is adequate. Maybe certain taggers should actually help the people who make these pages instead of crusading to tag every single page until wikipedia is "perfect". No, I did not write this article, and I probably will not. I was like, "hey, this is cool, I can make an article too!" lol no. The last article I wrote, on a cafe near Niagara falls, got tag swarmed >.< I think it's deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ScarySquirrel (talkcontribs) 05:52, 24 March 2009

This article is not fine - it has no citations. It has references, but they are meaningless if they do not point to mentioned facts in the article. To me, on first glance, the whole thing looks like a marketing attempt against Gnutella and eMule. I don't use these services, but what about privacy on other file sharing networks? Also, every headline is a big headline. Some of them might as well go under a subheading. In fact, I'll fix that now. But I know not nearly enough of P2P protocols to suggest their specific privacy concerns. I also don't know the consequences of trying to use I2P/Tor with these protocols (positive or negative). Such information would be handy in the article, if any one knows them... --86.5.226.63 (talk) 12:37, 24 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Privacy in file sharing networks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:49, 23 May 2017 (UTC)Reply