![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Request
editKindly add/ make a link for the following work:
“The New Russia. Transition Gone Awry” by Marshall Pomer; Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, 2001. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.141.145.69 (talk • contribs)
NPOV template must be supported by an ongoing discussion
editSomeone added a NPOV template without to open a discussion or explaining why he believe the article is not neutral. i provide below some wiki pages that explain the NPOV. In the meantime i'm gonna remove the template.
==>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:NPOVD#How_to_initiate_an_NPOV_debate
How to initiate an NPOV debate
If you come across an article whose content does not seem to be consistent with Wikipedia's NPOV policy, use one of the tags below to mark the article's main page. Then, on the article's talk page, make a new section entitled "NPOV dispute [- followed by a section's name if you're challenging just a particular section of the article and not the article as a whole]". Then, under this new section, clearly and exactly explain which part of the article does not seem to have a NPOV and why. Make some suggestions as to how one can improve the article. Be active and bold in improving the article.
==>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:NPOVD#Adding_a_page
Adding a page
To indicate that the neutrality of an article is disputed, insert
The neutrality of this article is disputed. |
at the top of the article to display:
Please note: This label is meant to indicate that a discussion is still going on, and that the article's content is disputed, and volatile. If you add this template to an article in which there is no relevant discussion underway, you need at least to leave a note on the article's talk page describing what you consider unacceptable about the article. The note should address the troubling passages, elements, or phrases specifically enough to encourage constructive discussion that leads to resolution. In the absence of an ongoing discussion on the article's talk page, any editor may remove this tag at any time.