This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Abortion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Abortion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AbortionWikipedia:WikiProject AbortionTemplate:WikiProject AbortionAbortion articles
This redirect was nominated for deletion on 18 June 2013. The result of the discussion was unredirect this talk page.
This redirect was nominated for retargeting on 18 June 2013. The result of the discussion was retarget the subject page.
Latest comment: 10 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion
I don't think it's appropriate to redirect Pro-life to anti-abortion. As the pro-life disambiguation notes, pro-life does not address just abortion. The movement also holds positions on euthanasia and other issues (cloning for example). The anti-abortion article is short and not in great shape. If it needs to be redirected to an article the abortion debate article is more thorough, although the problem of covering only part of the ideology remains. There are also articles on the pro-life movement in the United States and other articles covering subjects related to this topic. THe best approach at this point seems to be to redirec tot the disambiguation page. As is noted in our articles and in reliable sources, terms like anti-abortion and pro-abortion are not neutral. So for accuracy and neutrality we should try to be as on point as possible. Candleabracadabra (talk) 00:29, 22 January 2014 (UTC)Reply