Talk:Probabilism

Philosophy: Epistemology / Ethics Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Epistemology
	Ethics

Skepticism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Molina or Medina?

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I'm guessing that "Molina" means Luis de Molina. If so, this contradicts our article School of Salamanca, which I translated from a generally good (but citationless) article in the Spanish-language Wikipedia. That article says Bartolomé de Medina is the author of the doctrine. Can someone who knows this period better than I or who knows where to find a good independent source look into this? Thanks. -- Jmabel|Talk 03:03, Oct 15, 2004 (UTC)

Medina, per chapter 4 of J Franklin, science of conjecture, as referenced in article, chapter 4, is the author of the doctrine. Franklin also discusses Molina, in a related context. linas (talk) 15:38, 22 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

In moral theology

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Does the magisterium of the Catholic Church approve or disapprove of probabilism? 69.140.157.138 03:32, 21 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Probabilism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060613195347/http://www.philosophyprofessor.com/philosophies/probabilism.php to http://www.philosophyprofessor.com/philosophies/probabilism.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:01, 10 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic