Talk:Processional cross

Untitled

This page is extremely biased, only refering to practices of the Eastern Orthodox Church. Might I remind people that Roman Catholic (as well as other catholic), Anglican, Methodist, and some Lutheran churches also use Processional crosses? This article needs to be fixed or merged with Altar Crucifix. Tarheelz123 (talk) 12:31, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Processional cross. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120406063440/http://www.saintpaulsumc.org/worship/serving_as_an_acolyte to http://www.saintpaulsumc.org/worship/serving_as_an_acolyte/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:18, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Citations

This article needs citations to back up the information presented. There is not one citation under either the "Eastern Orthodoxy" or "Roman Catholicism and Anglicanism" headings, and many of the statements in the top part of the article are uncited. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RaptorOwl (talk • contribs) 22:42, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

@RaptorOwl I totally agree. However, in accordance with Wikipedia's lede policy, the lede section doesn't need citations unless it's controversial information or not stated in the remaining article. — I'ma editor2022 ^{(🗣️💬 |📖📚)} 03:27, 6 November 2023 (UTC)