Talk:Proconsul major
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Cwmhiraeth in topic Proposing merge of Proconsul major and Ugandapithecus major
The contents of the Ugandapithecus major page were merged into Proconsul major on 13 August 2019. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Proconsul major article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Proconsul major be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
This article refers to a taxon that doesn't have its type locality listed. If you can, please provide it. |
Size
editIf the animal is estimated at 50kg, then it most certainly was not "roughly the size of a gorilla"... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.187.251.185 (talk) 04:57, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Proposing merge of Proconsul major and Ugandapithecus major
edit- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result of this discussion was Merge. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:10, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
- Merge - Either Ugandapithecus major is the junior synonym of Proconsul major, or Ugandapithecus major is the new name for Proconsul major. Either way, they are the same species, and should only have one article. - [Proposed by NessieVL on 12 February 2019]
- Merge both into Proconsul with a discussion of the various taxonomic suggestions that have been made. --Kevmin § 17:31, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.