Talk:Procyanidin dimer
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Tom.Reding in topic Please confirm classification
This set index article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved to Procyanidin dimers per WP:CAPS -- JHunterJ (talk) 18:35, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
B type proanthocyanidin → Procyanidin Dimers – More appropriate name (proanthocyanidin is an umberella term) Markwdck (talk) 15:06, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
- Comment/Question – Are proanthocyanidins the same as procyanidins, or do two of the latter make one of the former? Even if move is appropriate in concept, should be to procyanidin dimers per WP:CAPS. ENeville (talk) 01:11, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Please confirm classification
editThe WikiProject classification for Procyanidin dimer is Start-class
. However, the page has less than 100 words, so it might not meet the grading criteria. If it should be a stub, then please set |class=Stub
on this talk page & reinstate the stub tag(s) on the article page. ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 18:48, 11 July 2016 (UTC)