This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This article appears at first read to be original research, because the only footnotes are case citations, which are primary sources, and the text itself consists largely of summaries of various court decisions, with wikilinks to articles on those decisions. The articles on the cases in turn lack any footnotes to anything other than case citations in most instances. On the other hand, there is a list of references to scholarly secondary reliable sources which I presume are the actual sources for the text of this article, but because there are not in-line citations, it is difficult, if not impossible to verify what they are being referenced for. Clearly the article is notable, but it needs to be rewritten based on those secondary sources rather than on original research, with appropriate inline citation to those sources. Banks Irk (talk) 17:46, 2 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
